VCL Didactical Design Patterns

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: Welcome » The VCL Patterns » Rating » Rating system » Individual Assessment

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
patterns:rating:rating_system:individual_assessment [2020/10/01 11:11]
editor 		patterns:rating:rating_system:individual_assessment [2022/09/19 10:08] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +==== Individual Assessment ====
 +
 ^**Problem** |The individual achievement or rather the contribution of the separate participants for the task-completion has to be rated by the lecturer.| ^**Problem** |The individual achievement or rather the contribution of the separate participants for the task-completion has to be rated by the lecturer.|
 ^**Framework** |The assignment of tutors for mentoring the teams and documenting their behaviour, as well as the work performance is recommended.| ^**Framework** |The assignment of tutors for mentoring the teams and documenting their behaviour, as well as the work performance is recommended.|
-^**Solution** | \\ For an objective rating of the participants' individual performance the written blog-entries of the team members should be considered (see Self-Assessment of the Team). \\  \\ Additionally, the tutors mentoring the teams deliver the context of the individual efforts of the participants. This includes the documentation of the contribution of every single team member (e.g. participation on all meetings, bringing in ideas in the discussion forum, completion of his or her tasks) by using an evaluation sheet. \\  \\ With the help of the described blog-entries and the evaluation sheets, the lecturer distributes points to every participant on a scoring scale from 0 up to 100 points. \\  \\ //Example: See [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:self-assessment_of_the_team|Self-Assessment of the Team]]// | +^**Solution** | \\ For an objective rating of the participants' individual performance the written blog-entries of the team members should be considered (see Self-Assessment of the Team). \\  \\ Additionally, the tutors mentoring the teams deliver the context of the individual efforts of the participants. This includes the documentation of the contribution of every single team member (e.g. participation on all meetings, bringing in ideas in the discussion forum, completion of his or her tasks) by using an evaluation sheet. \\  \\ With the help of the described blog-entries and the evaluation sheets, the lecturer distributes points to every participant on a scoring scale from 0 up to 100 points. \\  \\ //Example: See [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:self-assessment_of_the_team|]]// | 
-^**References** | \\  \\  \\ [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:rating_criteria|Rating Criteria]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:patterns:rating:acknowledgement_of_the_rating_results|Acknowledgement of the Rating Results ]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:patterns:rating:rating_system|Educational Objectives of the VCL Project]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:rating_scheme|Rating Scheme ]]|+^**References** |[[:patterns:rating:rating_criteria|]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:acknowledgement_of_the_rating_results|Acknowledgement of the Rating Results ]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:rating_system:educational_objectives_of_the_vcl_project|]] \\  [[:patterns:rating:rating_scheme|]]|
  
  

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International Driven by DokuWiki